Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalência de incidentes sem dano e eventos adversos em uma clínica cirúrgica / Prevalence of no harm incidents and adverse events in a surgical clinic
Paranaguá, Thatianny Tanferri de Brito; Bezerra, Ana Lúcia Queiroz; Silva, Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo e; Azevedo Filho, Francino Machado de.
  • Paranaguá, Thatianny Tanferri de Brito; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Faculdade de Enfermagem. Goiânia. BR
  • Bezerra, Ana Lúcia Queiroz; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Faculdade de Enfermagem. Goiânia. BR
  • Silva, Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo e; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Faculdade de Enfermagem. Goiânia. BR
  • Azevedo Filho, Francino Machado de; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Goiânia. BR
Acta paul. enferm ; 26(3): 256-262, 2013.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: lil-681817
RESUMO
OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência de incidentes sem dano e eventos adversos em uma clínica cirúrgica. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal conduzido com amostra de 750 internações ocorridas na clínica cirúrgica de um hospital da região centro-oeste. Realizou-se análise descritiva e calculou-se a prevalência dos incidentes. RESULTADOS: Evidenciou-se que 615 internações foram expostas ao incidente sem dano e 140 ao evento adverso. Dos 5.672 registros de incidentes, 218 foram caracterizados como evento adverso por causarem dano ao paciente. Os demais não evidenciaram dano, entretanto apontaram necessidade de adequação dos processos de trabalho. CONCLUSÃO: Estimou-se prevalência de 82% de incidentes sem dano e 18,7% de eventos adversos.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of no harm incidents and adverse events in a surgical clinic. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted with a sample of 750 hospitalizations in the surgical clinic of a hospital in the mid-west region. A descriptive analysis was performed and the prevalence of incidents was calculated. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that 615 hospitalizations were exposed to no harm incidents and 140 to adverse events. Of the 5,672 reported incidents, 218 were characterized as adverse events that caused harm to the patient. No harm was proven for the others; however, they highlighted the need for an adjustment to work processes. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of no harm incidents was estimated at 82%, and 18.7% for adverse events.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Perioperative Nursing / Safety Management / Delivery of Health Care / Patient Safety / Iatrogenic Disease / Nursing Assessment / Nursing Service, Hospital Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors / Screening study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Portuguese Journal: Acta paul. enferm Journal subject: Nursing Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Goiás/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Perioperative Nursing / Safety Management / Delivery of Health Care / Patient Safety / Iatrogenic Disease / Nursing Assessment / Nursing Service, Hospital Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors / Screening study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Portuguese Journal: Acta paul. enferm Journal subject: Nursing Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Goiás/BR