Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mild cognitive impairment (part 2): biological markers for diagnosis and prediction of dementia in Alzheimer's disease
Forlenza, Orestes V.; Diniz, Breno S.; Teixeira, Antonio L.; Stella, Florindo; Gattaz, Wagner.
  • Forlenza, Orestes V.; Universidade de Sao Paulo. School of Medicine. Department and Institute of Psychiatry. Laboratory of Neuroscience. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Diniz, Breno S.; Universidade de Sao Paulo. School of Medicine. Department and Institute of Psychiatry. Laboratory of Neuroscience. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Teixeira, Antonio L.; Universidade de Sao Paulo. School of Medicine. Department and Institute of Psychiatry. Laboratory of Neuroscience. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Stella, Florindo; Universidade de Sao Paulo. School of Medicine. Department and Institute of Psychiatry. Laboratory of Neuroscience. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Gattaz, Wagner; Universidade de Sao Paulo. School of Medicine. Department and Institute of Psychiatry. Laboratory of Neuroscience. Sao Paulo. BR
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 35(3): 284-294, Jul-Sep. 2013.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-687937
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To present a critical review of publications reporting on the rationale and clinical implications of the use of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Methods:

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases, limited to articles published in English between 1999 and 2012, and based on the following terms mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease OR dementia, biomarkers. We retrieved 1,130 articles, of which 175 were reviews. Overall, 955 original articles were eligible.

Results:

The following points were considered relevant for the present review a) rationale for biomarkers research in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI); b) usefulness of distinct biomarkers for the diagnosis and prediction of AD; c) the role of multimodality biomarkers for the diagnosis and prediction of AD; d) the role of biomarkers in clinical trials of patients with AD and MCI; and e) current limitations to the widespread use of biomarkers in research and clinical settings.

Conclusion:

Different biomarkers are useful for the early diagnosis and prediction of AD in at-risk subjects. Nonetheless, important methodological limitations need to be overcome for widespread use of biomarkers in research and clinical settings. .
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Alzheimer Disease / Cognitive Dysfunction Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2013 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Sao Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Alzheimer Disease / Cognitive Dysfunction Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2013 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Sao Paulo/BR