Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative analysis of the diameter of MTwo® system gutta-percha points in relation to their corresponding instruments
Salles, Alexandre Azevedo; Cord, Caroline Berwanger; Sonnemann, Taciane Sperb; Melo, Tiago André Fontoura de; Irala, Luis Eduardo Duarte; Oliveira, Elias Pandonor Motcy de.
Affiliation
  • Salles, Alexandre Azevedo; Lutheran University of Brazil. Department of Dentistry. Canoas. BR
  • Cord, Caroline Berwanger; Lutheran University of Brazil. Department of Dentistry. Canoas. BR
  • Sonnemann, Taciane Sperb; Lutheran University of Brazil. Department of Dentistry. Canoas. BR
  • Melo, Tiago André Fontoura de; Lutheran University of Brazil. Department of Dentistry. Canoas. BR
  • Irala, Luis Eduardo Duarte; Lutheran University of Brazil. Department of Dentistry. Canoas. BR
  • Oliveira, Elias Pandonor Motcy de; Lutheran University of Brazil. Department of Dentistry. Canoas. BR
RSBO (Impr.) ; 10(1): 49-55, Jan.-Mar. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-695912
Responsible library: BR97.1
ABSTRACT
Introduction and

Objective:

This study aimed to compare the diameter of sizes 25/.06, 30/.05, 35/.04, 40/.04 and 25/.07 main gutta-percha point of MTwo® system in relation to their corresponding nickel-titanium instruments. Material and

methods:

For this purpose, the measurements of both the main gutta-percha points and their corresponding instruments were obtained with the aid of a caliper at the positions D1, D3 and D11. Twenty points and six instruments of each size were used.

Results:

Data were subjected to student t test, with a significance level of 5%. It could be observed that there was a variation in the diameter of the gutta-percha points in relation to the diameter of the instruments. At D1 and D3, size 25/.07 points had diameters significantly higher than their respective instruments. At D11, sizes 25/.06, 25/.07, 30/.05 and 35/.04 points also had significantly higher diameters. For size 40/.04 point, there were no statistically significant differences between the point and instrument diameters.

Conclusion:

Most of the main gutta-percha points of MTwo® system analyzed in this study showed significantly greater diameters than those of their corresponding instruments. Only the size 40/.04 points did not present significant differences in diameter compared with their corresponding instrument.
Key words
Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Language: En Journal: RSBO (Impr.) Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2013 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Language: En Journal: RSBO (Impr.) Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2013 Type: Article