Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tissue response around Morse taper and external hexagon implants: preliminary results of a randomized split-mouth design / Resposta tecidual ao redor de implantes cone Morse e hexágono externo: resultados preliminares de um estudo em boca dividida
Sumiyassu, Sueli; Melo, Ana Cláudia Moreira; Sartor, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias; Fontão, Flávia Noemi Gasparini Kiatake; Ferreira, Edilson José; Thomé, Geninho.
  • Sumiyassu, Sueli; s.af
  • Melo, Ana Cláudia Moreira; Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education. Curitiba. BR
  • Sartor, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias; Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education. Curitiba. BR
  • Fontão, Flávia Noemi Gasparini Kiatake; Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education. Curitiba. BR
  • Ferreira, Edilson José; Imppar Dentistry. Londrina. BR
  • Thomé, Geninho; Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education. Curutiba. BR
Rev. Salusvita (Online) ; 32(1)2013. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-698387
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

the rehabilitation of edentulous mandible by four interforaminal implants with the distal ones inserted tilted in order to avoid proximity with the mentual foramen as well as improving prosthesis support have been argued as an adequate design for implant supported fixed prosthesis.

Objective:

the aim of this study was to compare tissue response around immediately loaded mandibular dental implants with two different prosthetic connections.

Methods:

a total of 48 implants were inserted in the anterior region of the mandible of 12 edentulous patients following a randomized split-mouth design. Morse Taper and External Hexagon implants were equally divided into each patient. Distal implants were tilted and central implants axially positioned in relation to the alveolar crest. Standardized intraoral radiographs were taken immediately after implant placement and after 6 months. Periodontal parameters (probing depth and keratinized tissue width and height) were recorded at the same times. Wilcoxon test was used. Results and

Discussion:

It was observed stability of the gingival margin and decrease in probing depth around Morse taper implants and increase in external hexagon implants. There was marginal bone increase in the mesial face (0.27 mm) and decrease at the distal face (-0.87 mm) of Morse taper and at both proximal faces of external hexagonimplants (-1.06 mm and -0.80 mm, respectively). Morse taper tilted implants showed maintenance of bone height (0.03 mm and-0.02mm, mesial and distal) while external hexagon implants showed resorption (-1.82 mm and -0.75 mm, mesial and distal). Axially positioned implants showed bone loss, either Morse taper (-0.72 and-0.67mm, mesial and distal) or external hexagon (-0.69 and -0.83mm).
RESUMO

Introdução:

Tem sido sugerido que a reabilitação de mandíbulas edêntulas por meio de quatro implantes interforaminais, sendo os implantes distais instalados inclinados com o objetivo de evitar proximidade com o foramen mentual assim como melhorar o suporte da prótese, é um desenho adequado para próteses fixas implantossuportadas.

Objetivo:

o objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a resposta tecidual ao redor de implantes dentários mandibulares com dois diferentes tipos de conexões.

Métodos:

quarenta e oito implantes foram instalados na região anterior da mandíbula de 12 pacientes edêntulos segundo desenho experimental em boca dividida. Implantes cone Morse (CM) e hexágono externo (HE) foram igualmente distribuídos entre os pacientes. Os implantes distais foram instalados inclinados e os centrais axiais à crista óssea alveolar. Radiografias intrabucais padronizadas foram tomadas após a instalação dos implantes e após 6 meses. Parâmetros periodontais (profundidade de sondagem e altura e espessura de tecido queratinizado) foram registrados nos mesmos tempos. Resultados e discussão observou-se estabilidade da margem gengival ao redor dos implantes CM e aumento nos implantes HE. Houve ganho ósseo em altura na face mesial (0,27 mm) e diminuição na face distal (-0,87 mm) dos implantes CM e em ambas as faces dos implantes HE (-1,06 mm e -0,80 mm, respectivamente). Implantes CM inclinados mostraram manutenção da altura óssea (0,03 m e -0,02mm, mesial e distal) enquanto os HE mostraram perda em altura (-1,82 mm e -0,75 mm, mesial e distal). Implantes axiais, CM (-0,72 e -0,67mm, mesial e distal) e HE (-0,69 e -0,83 mm) mostraram perda óssea.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Immediate Dental Implant Loading / Mandibular Reconstruction / Mouth Rehabilitation Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: Portuguese Journal: Rev. Salusvita (Online) Journal subject: Biologia / Ciˆncia Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Imppar Dentistry/BR / Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Immediate Dental Implant Loading / Mandibular Reconstruction / Mouth Rehabilitation Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: Portuguese Journal: Rev. Salusvita (Online) Journal subject: Biologia / Ciˆncia Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Imppar Dentistry/BR / Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education/BR