Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
Rocha, José Maurício da; Gravina, Marco Abdo; Campos, Marcio José da Silva; Quintão, Cátia Cardoso Abdo; Elias, Carlos Nelson; Vitral, Robert Willer Farinazzo.
  • Rocha, José Maurício da; Federal University of Juiz de Fora. School of Dentistry. Department of Orthodontics.
  • Gravina, Marco Abdo; Federal University of Juiz de Fora. School of Dentistry. Department of Orthodontics.
  • Campos, Marcio José da Silva; Federal University of Juiz de Fora. School of Dentistry. Department of Orthodontics.
  • Quintão, Cátia Cardoso Abdo; Federal University of Juiz de Fora. School of Dentistry. Department of Orthodontics.
  • Elias, Carlos Nelson; Federal University of Juiz de Fora. School of Dentistry. Department of Orthodontics.
  • Vitral, Robert Willer Farinazzo; Federal University of Juiz de Fora. School of Dentistry. Department of Orthodontics.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 19(1): 77-85, Jan-Feb/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-709635
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate, in vitro, the shear bond strength presented by three brands of polycrystalline ceramic brackets and one brand of metallic bracket; verify the adhesive remnant index (ARI) after the tests, and analyze, through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the enamel surface topography after debonding, detecting the release of mineral particles.

METHODS:

Sixty bovine lower incisors were used. Three ceramic brackets (Allure(r), InVu(r), and Clarity(r)) and one metallic bracket (Geneus(r)) were bonded with Transbond XT(r). Kruskal-Wallis's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of share bond and ARI. Mann Whitney's test was performed to compare the pairs of brackets in relation to their ARI. Brown-Forsythe's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of enamel chemical composition. Comparisons between groups were made with Games-Howell's and the Post-hoc tests.

RESULTS:

No statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the shear bond strength loads. Clarity(r) brackets were the most affected in relation to the surface topography and to the release of mineral particles of enamel (calcium ions).

CONCLUSION:

With regard to the ARI, there was a prevalence of score 4 (40.4%). As for enamel surface topography, the Geneus(r) bracket was the only one which did not show superficial tissue loss. The InVu(r) and Clarity(r) ones showed cohesive fractures in 33.3% and the Allure(r) in 50%, the latter being the one that presented most fractures during removal. .
RESUMO

OBJETIVO:

avaliar, in vitro, a resistência ao cisalhamento apresentada por três marcas de braquetes ortodônticos cerâmicos policristalinos e uma marca de braquete metálico, verificando os índices de resina remanescentes (IRA) após os ensaios, e analisar, por meio de microscopia eletrônica de varredura, as topografias superficiais do esmalte após a descolagem, detectando o desprendimento de partículas minerais desse.

MÉTODOS:

foram utilizados 60 incisivos inferiores bovinos. Os braquetes cerâmicos (Allure, InVu e Clarity) e metálico (Geneus) foram colados utilizando-se o adesivo Transbond XT. Para os resultados referentes ao cisalhamento e ao IRA, foi utilizado o teste de Kruskal-Wallis, com nível de significância de 5%. A prova de Mann-Whtiney foi utilizada para comparar os diferentes tipos de braquetes aos pares, quanto ao IRA. Para a análise dos resultados referentes às composições químicas do esmalte, aplicou-se o teste de Brown-Forsythe, com significância de 5%. As comparações entre os grupos foram realizadas utilizando os testes Post Hoc e de Games-Hoewell.

RESULTADOS:

não foram observadas diferenças significativas quanto às cargas de cisalhamento. O Clarity foi o mais afetado em relação à topografia e ao desprendimento de partículas minerais do esmalte (íons Ca).

CONCLUSÃO:

em relação ao IRA, foi confirmada a prevalência do escore 4, com um percentual de 40,4%. Em relação à topografia superficial do esmalte, o Geneus foi o único que não apresentou perda de tecido . O InVu e o Clarity apresentaram fraturas coesivas de 33,3% de suas amostras, e o Allure de 50%, sendo o que mais fraturou durante a remoção. .
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ceramics / Dental Bonding / Orthodontic Brackets / Dental Alloys / Dental Enamel / Dental Materials Type of study: Risk factors Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) Journal subject: Orthodontics Year: 2014 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ceramics / Dental Bonding / Orthodontic Brackets / Dental Alloys / Dental Enamel / Dental Materials Type of study: Risk factors Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) Journal subject: Orthodontics Year: 2014 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil