Cuestionario Honey-Alonso de estilos de aprendizaje: análisis de sus propiedades psicométricas en estudiantes universitarios / Honey-Alonso learning styles questionnaire: an analysis of its psychometric properties in college students
Summa psicol. UST
;
10(1): 103-117, jul. 2013. ilus, tab
Article
in Spanish
| LILACS
| ID: lil-713270
RESUMEN
Se investigan propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario Honey-Alonso de Estilos de Aprendizaje, mediante dos estudios de validez, uno de contenido y aparente, y otro de constructo. El primero examinó reactivos y escala mediante juicio experto y administraciones piloto. El segundo revisó la estructura dimensional mediante análisis de componentes principales (ACP) y consistencia interna por un lado; y análisis factorial confirmatoria (AFC) por el otro, a partir de dos muestras independientes de estudiantes universitarios argentinos. El primer estudio modificó 8 reactivos, y conservó la escala dicotómica de respuesta. Del segundo, el ACP extrajo cuatro dimensiones convergente, asimilador, adaptador, pragmático- con adecuada consistencia interna, respondiendo sólo la pragmática al modelo teórico de partida. El AFC comparó el modelo del ACP con el de Alonso, Gallego y Honey (1994), obteniéndose un mejor ajuste del primero. Los resultados avalan la estructura factorial obtenida en el ACP concluyendo que el cuestionario evalúa los cuatro estilos hallados.
ABSTRACT
Honey-Alonso Learning Styles Questionnaires psychometric properties were analyzed. In order to do this, two different studies were developed content and facies validity in one hand, and construct validity procedures in the other. The very first examined items and scale by expert judgment. The second one used principal components analysis (PCA) and internal consistency in a preliminary stage, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the following. Two independent Argentinean college student samples were analyzed. Content validity results indicate the needing of modifying 8 items. Dichotomous answer scale was preserved. According to the results of construct validity, CPA showed four dimensions with better fit and good internal consistency. Only one of them -pragmatic component- responded to the original model. The remaining factors assimilatory, convergent, adaptive- were identified as belonging to Kolb´s (1984) theoretical model. Confirmatory factor analysis compared PCA model with Alonso, Gallego and Honey´s model (1994), obtaining a better fit for the first. Results support PCA´s structural dimensions for the questionnaire.
Full text:
Available
Index:
LILACS (Americas)
Main subject:
Students
/
Surveys and Questionnaires
/
Learning
Type of study:
Observational study
/
Prevalence study
/
Prognostic study
/
Qualitative research
/
Risk factors
Limits:
Humans
Language:
Spanish
Journal:
Summa psicol. UST
Journal subject:
Psychology
Year:
2013
Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Argentina
Institution/Affiliation country:
Universidad de Buenos Aires/AR
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS