Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Abrasive wear of two glass ionomer cements after simulated toothbrushing
Freitas, Márcia Furtado Antunes de; Imai, Leandro Jum; Freitas, César Antunes de; Bianchi, Eduardo Carlos; Almeida, Carina Thaís de; Martins Filho, Ismar Eduardo.
  • Freitas, Márcia Furtado Antunes de; University of Sao Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Imai, Leandro Jum; University of Sao Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Freitas, César Antunes de; University of Sao Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Bianchi, Eduardo Carlos; University of Sao Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Almeida, Carina Thaís de; University of Sao Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Martins Filho, Ismar Eduardo; University of Sao Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
RSBO (Impr.) ; 8(3): 287-293, Jul.-Sep. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-720316
ABSTRACT
Introduction and

objective:

Glass ionomer cement, which was first introduced in Dentistry in 1972, presents good qualities such as aesthetics, fluoride release and adhesion to dental tissues. Because of its preventive characteristics regarding to dental caries, glass ionomer cement has been used for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), as reported by Frencken and Holmgren 6, meeting the principles announced by the World Health Organization (WHO) for application to large population groups without regular access to dental care. Material and

methods:

In this present study, the abrasive wear strength of two glass-ionomer cements (Vidrion R® and ChemFlex®) was evaluated through toothbrushing machine. Classic® toothbrushes with soft bristles and Sorriso® dentifrice were also used for the study.

Results:

Student-t test showed significant difference between both groups, with tobs value = 9.4411 at p < 0.05.

Conclusion:

It can be concluded that the wear rate caused by toothbrush/dentifrice was higher for Vidrion R® (52.00 mg) than ChemFlex® (5.57 mg).

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: RSBO (Impr.) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Sao Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: RSBO (Impr.) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Sao Paulo/BR