Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dimensional accuracy of stone casts made by a monophase impression technique using different elastomeric impression materials
Vitti, Rafael Pino; Correr-Sobrinho, Lourenço; Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho.
  • Vitti, Rafael Pino; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Dental Materials Division. Piracicaba. BR
  • Correr-Sobrinho, Lourenço; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Dental Materials Division. Piracicaba. BR
  • Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Dental Materials Division. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 10(3): 175-179, Jul.-Sep. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-725237
ABSTRACT
Impression taking is a critical step in the process of producing successful crowns and fixed partial dentures in oral rehabilitation, and the impression material is an important factor related to clinical success.

Aim:

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the dimensional accuracy of stone casts made from a monophase technique using 10 elastomeric impression materials.

Methods:

First, a stainless steel model with reference points in the teeth 33, 43, 37, and 47 was used to obtain the impressions. The distances were measured among teeth 33-43, 37-47, 33-37, and 43-47. For the impression technique, acrylic resin trays were made with an internal relief of approximately 2 mm. Specific adhesives for each material were used in the custom trays. Tray detachment movement was standardized by pneumatic equipment. After the impression procedures and obtaining of samples, the stone casts were observed in a measuring microscope at 30x magnification. Data recorded for each distance were analyzed statistically by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test at 5% significance level.

Results:

Stone casts made with elastomeric impression materials showed statistically significant (p<0.05) differences when the dimensional accuracy values were compared. The order for the highest to lowest accuracy for the types of impression materials was as follws polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), polyether, polysulfide and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).

Conclusions:

PVS were the most dimensionally accurate impression materials, and the PDMS showed the worst results of dimensional accuracy.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Impression Technique / Dental Materials / Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Impression Technique / Dental Materials / Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Campinas/BR