Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
Oliveira, Dauro Douglas; Bradley, Thomas Gerard; Pithon, Matheus Melo; Pantuzo, Mariele Cristina Garcia; Akaki, Emílio; Dhuru, Virendra.
  • Oliveira, Dauro Douglas; Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Department of Dentistry. Area of Orthodontics. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Bradley, Thomas Gerard; Marquette University. School of Dentistry. Department of Developmental Sciences, Area of Orthodontics. Milwaukee,. US
  • Pithon, Matheus Melo; Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESB. School of Dentistry. Department of Healthy, Area of Orthodontics. Jequié. BR
  • Pantuzo, Mariele Cristina Garcia; Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Department of Dentistry. Area of Orthodontics. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Akaki, Emílio; Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Department of Dentistry. Area of Orthodontics. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Dhuru, Virendra; Marquette University. School of Dentistry. Department of General Dental Sciences, Area of Dental Materials. Milwaukee. US
Braz. j. oral sci ; 13(4): 270-275, Oct-Dec/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-732339
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets.

Methods:

105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according to the enamel surface treatments conditioners (35% phosphoric acid and 10% polyacrylic acid), type of adhesive (Transbond(r) and Fuji Ortho LC Capsule(r)), washing time and drying of the surface.

Results:

A significant p<0.05 was observed among the shear bond strength values obtained with seven different types of enamel preparation prior to bonding. The group that had the tooth surface conditioned with polyacrylic acid and enamel surface slightly dried before bracket placement showed no significant difference (p>0.05) to the group that had brackets bonded with composite resin. The two groups that had enamel prepared with polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with GIC on a wet surface showed significantly lower shear bond strength than the control group (p<0.05).

Conclusions:

Moisture contamination decreased SBS, but not enough to preclude the use of RMGIC as an alternative to composite resin (CR) for direct bonding of ceramic brackets.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Bonding / Orthodontic Brackets / Shear Strength / Glass Ionomer Cements Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2014 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Marquette University/US / Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais/BR / Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESB/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Bonding / Orthodontic Brackets / Shear Strength / Glass Ionomer Cements Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2014 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Marquette University/US / Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais/BR / Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESB/BR