Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants
SARTORETTO, Suelen Cristina; ALVES, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino; RESENDE, Rodrigo Figueiredo Britto; CALASANS-MAIA, José; GRANJEIRO, José Mauro; CALASANS-MAIA, Mônica Diuana.
  • SARTORETTO, Suelen Cristina; Fluminense Federal University. Niteroi. BR
  • ALVES, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino; Fluminense Federal University. Niteroi. BR
  • RESENDE, Rodrigo Figueiredo Britto; Fluminense Federal University. Niteroi. BR
  • CALASANS-MAIA, José; Fluminense Federal University. Niteroi. BR
  • GRANJEIRO, José Mauro; Fluminense Federal University. Niteroi. BR
  • CALASANS-MAIA, Mônica Diuana; Fluminense Federal University. Niteroi. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 23(3): 279-287, May-Jun/2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-752437
ABSTRACT
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of two different commercially available dental implants on osseointegration. The surfaces were sandblasting and acid etching (Group 1) and sandblasting and acid etching, then maintained in an isotonic solution of 0.9% sodium chloride (Group 2). Material and Methods X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed for surface chemistry analysis. Surface morphology and topography was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy (CM), respectively. Contact angle analysis (CAA) was employed for wetting evaluation. Bone-implant-contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupied (BAFO) analysis were performed on thin sections (30 μm) 14 and 28 days after the installation of 10 implants from each group (n=20) in rabbits' tibias. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA at the 95% level of significance considering implantation time and implant surface as independent variables. Results Group 2 showed 3-fold less carbon on the surface and a markedly enhanced hydrophilicity compared to Group 1 but a similar surface roughness (p>0.05). BIC and BAFO levels in Group 2 at 14 days were similar to those in Group 1 at 28 days. After 28 days of installation, BIC and BAFO measurements of Group 2 were approximately 1.5-fold greater than in Group 1 (p<0.05). Conclusion The surface chemistry and wettability implants of Group 2 accelerate osseointegration and increase the area of the bone-to-implant interface when compared to those of Group 1. .
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Titanium / Dental Implants / Osseointegration / Dental Implantation, Endosseous Type of study: Evaluation studies Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Fluminense Federal University/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Titanium / Dental Implants / Osseointegration / Dental Implantation, Endosseous Type of study: Evaluation studies Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Fluminense Federal University/BR