Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do Foley Catheters Adequately Drain the Bladder? Evidence from CT Imaging Studies
Avulova, Svetlana; Li, Valery J.; Khusid, Johnathan A.; Choi, Woo S.; Weiss, Jeffrey P..
  • Avulova, Svetlana; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Brooklyn. US
  • Li, Valery J.; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Brooklyn. US
  • Khusid, Johnathan A.; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Brooklyn. US
  • Choi, Woo S.; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Brooklyn. US
  • Weiss, Jeffrey P.; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Brooklyn. US
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 552-555, May-June 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-755861
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT<h2>Introduction:</h2>

The Foley catheter has been widely assumed to be an effective means of draining the bladder. However, recent studies have brought into question its efficacy. The objective of our study is to further assess the adequacy of Foley catheter for complete drainage of the bladder.

Materials and <h2>Methods:</h2>

Consecutive catheterized patients were identified from a retrospective review of contrast enhanced and non-contrast enhanced computed tomo-graphic (CT) abdomen and pelvis studies completed from 7/1/2011-6/30/2012. Residual urine volume (RUV) was measured using 5mm axial CT sections as follows The length (L) and width (W) of the bladder in the section with the greatest cross sectional area was combined with bladder height (H) as determined by multiplanar reformatted images in order to calculate RUV by applying the formula for the volume (V) of a sphere in a cube V=(ϖ/6)*(L*W*H).

<h2>Results:</h2>

RUVs of 167 (mean age 67) consecutively catheterized men (n=72) and women (n=95) identified by CT abdomen and pelvis studies were calculated. The mean RUV was 13.2 mL (range 0.0 mL-859.1 mL, standard deviation 75.9 mL, margin of error at 95% confidence11.6 mL). Four (2.4%) catheterized patients had RUVs of >50 mL, two of whom had an improperly placed catheter tip noted on their CT-reports.

<h2>Conclusions:</h2>

Previous studies have shown that up to 43% of catheterized patients had a RUV greater than 50 mL, suggesting inadequacy of bladder drainage via the Foley catheter. Our study indicated that the vast majority of patients with Foley catheters (97.6%), had adequately drained bladders with volumes of <50 mL.

.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Urinary Bladder / Urinary Catheterization / Drainage / Urinary Catheters Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States Institution/Affiliation country: SUNY Downstate College of Medicine/US

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Urinary Bladder / Urinary Catheterization / Drainage / Urinary Catheters Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States Institution/Affiliation country: SUNY Downstate College of Medicine/US