Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reported shoes size during GH therapy: is foot overgrowth a myth or reality?
Lago, Débora C. F.; Coutinho, Cláudia A.; Kochi, Cristiane; Longui, Carlos A..
  • Lago, Débora C. F.; Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. Pediatrics Department. São Paulo. BR
  • Coutinho, Cláudia A.; Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. Pediatrics Department. São Paulo. BR
  • Kochi, Cristiane; Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. Pediatrics Department. São Paulo. BR
  • Longui, Carlos A.; Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. Pediatrics Department. São Paulo. BR
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 59(5): 414-421, Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-764114
ABSTRACT
Objectives To describe population reference values for shoes size, and to identify possible disproportional foot growth during GH therapy.Materials and methods Construction of percentile chart based on 3,651 controls (male 1,838; female 1,813). The GH treated group included 13 children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and 50 children with normal height, but with height prediction below their target height; male 26 and female 37 mean ± SD age 13.3 ± 1.9 and 12.9 ± 1.5 years, respectively. GH (0.05 mg/kg/day) was used for 3.2 ± 1.6 years, ranging from 1.0-10.3 years. Height expressed as SDS, target height (TH) SDS, self-reported shoes size and target shoes size (TSS) SDS were recorded.Results Reference values were established showed as a foot SDS calculator available online at www.clinicalcaselearning.com/v2. Definitive shoes size was attained in controls at mean age of 13y in girls and 14y in boys (average values 37 and 40, respectively). In the study group, shoes size was -0.15 ± 0.9 and -0.02 ± 1.3 SDS, with target feet of 0.08 ± 0.8 and -0.27 ± 0.7 SDS in males and females, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between shoes size and familial TSS, between shoes size and height and between TSS and TH. There was no correlation between duration of GH treatment and shoes size. Our data suggest that during long-term treatment with GH, patients maintain proportional growth in shoes size and height, and the expected correlation with the familial target.Conclusions We conclude that there is no excessive increase in the size of foot as estimated by the size of shoes in individuals under long term GH therapy.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Shoes / Human Growth Hormone / Foot / Growth Disorders Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Journal subject: Endocrinology / Metabolism Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Shoes / Human Growth Hormone / Foot / Growth Disorders Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Journal subject: Endocrinology / Metabolism Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences/BR