Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
Tok, Adem; Akbas, Alparslan; Aytan, Nimet; Aliskan, Tamer; Cicekbilek, Izzet; Kaba, Mehmet; Tepeler, Abdulkadir.
  • Tok, Adem; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
  • Akbas, Alparslan; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
  • Aytan, Nimet; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
  • Aliskan, Tamer; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
  • Cicekbilek, Izzet; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
  • Kaba, Mehmet; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
  • Tepeler, Abdulkadir; Bulent Ecevit University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Urology. Zonguldak. TR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(5): 982-989, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-767046
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

We assessed and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding ionizing radiation of urology surgery room staff. Materials and

Methods:

A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to urology surgery room personnel in Turkey, between June and August 2013. The questionnaire included demographic questions and questions regarding radiation exposure and protection.

Results:

In total, 127 questionnaires were answered. Of them, 62 (48.8%) were nurses, 51 (40.2%) were other personnel, and 14 (11%) were radiological technicians. In total, 113 (89%) participants had some knowledge of radiation, but only 56 (44.1%) had received specific education or training regarding the harmful effects of radiation. In total, 92 (72.4%) participants indicated that they used a lead apron and a thyroid shield. In the subgroup that had received education about the harmful effects of radiation, the use ratio for all protective procedures was 21.4% (n=12); this ratio was only 2.8% (n=2) for those with no specific training; the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Regarding dosimeters, the use rates were 100% for radiology technicians, 46.8% for nurses, and 31.4% for other hospital personnel; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). No significant relationship between working period in the surgery room, number of daily fluoroscopy procedures, education, task, and use of radiation protection measures was found.

Conclusions:

It is clear that operating room-allied health personnel exposed to radiation do not have sufficient knowledge of ionizing radiation and they do not take sufficient protective measures.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Operating Rooms / Radiation, Ionizing / Urologic Surgical Procedures / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Health Personnel / Radiation Exposure Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Institution/Affiliation country: Bulent Ecevit University/TR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Operating Rooms / Radiation, Ionizing / Urologic Surgical Procedures / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Health Personnel / Radiation Exposure Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Institution/Affiliation country: Bulent Ecevit University/TR