Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: updated results of the Seoul National university hospital experience
Kim, Hyung Suk; Lee, Joong Sub; Jeong, Chang Wook; Kwak, Cheol; Kim, Hyeon Hoe; Ku, Ja Hyeon.
Affiliation
  • Kim, Hyung Suk; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Lee, Joong Sub; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Jeong, Chang Wook; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Kwak, Cheol; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Kim, Hyeon Hoe; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Ku, Ja Hyeon; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1067-1079, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-769747
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to update the long-term outcome in the treatment of locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and

methods:

Clinical data from 138 patients who underwent RNU for locally advanced UTUC (pT3/4 or pN+) were analyzed.

Results:

The adjuvant chemotherapy group comprised 66 patients, and other 72 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was the most common regimen, depending on the patient's eligibility and renal function. The median follow-up period was 48.7 months (interquartile range 29.2-96.9 months). The 3-and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 76.0% and 69.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 74.6% and 54.5% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.301, log-rank test). Overall survival (OS) rates for the same time period were 70.1% and 62.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 73.8% and 53.2% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.931, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy could not predict DSS and OS after surgery. When patients who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=59) were compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, similar results were found.

Conclusions:

There does not appear to be a significant DSS or OS benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to verify the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on locally advanced UTUC.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Ureteral Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / Cisplatin / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Ureteral Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / Cisplatin / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document