Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: updated results of the Seoul National university hospital experience
Kim, Hyung Suk; Lee, Joong Sub; Jeong, Chang Wook; Kwak, Cheol; Kim, Hyeon Hoe; Ku, Ja Hyeon.
  • Kim, Hyung Suk; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Lee, Joong Sub; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Jeong, Chang Wook; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Kwak, Cheol; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Kim, Hyeon Hoe; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Ku, Ja Hyeon; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1067-1079, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-769747
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to update the long-term outcome in the treatment of locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and

methods:

Clinical data from 138 patients who underwent RNU for locally advanced UTUC (pT3/4 or pN+) were analyzed.

Results:

The adjuvant chemotherapy group comprised 66 patients, and other 72 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was the most common regimen, depending on the patient's eligibility and renal function. The median follow-up period was 48.7 months (interquartile range 29.2-96.9 months). The 3-and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 76.0% and 69.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 74.6% and 54.5% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.301, log-rank test). Overall survival (OS) rates for the same time period were 70.1% and 62.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 73.8% and 53.2% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.931, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy could not predict DSS and OS after surgery. When patients who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=59) were compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, similar results were found.

Conclusions:

There does not appear to be a significant DSS or OS benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to verify the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on locally advanced UTUC.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ureteral Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / Cisplatin / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: South Korea Institution/Affiliation country: Seoul National University/KR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ureteral Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / Cisplatin / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: South Korea Institution/Affiliation country: Seoul National University/KR