Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques; Soares, Ana Prates; Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima; Martins, Lidia Parsekian; Gandini Junior, Luiz Gonzaga.
  • Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques; Universidade Estadual Paulista. Araraquara Dental School. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Clinic. Araraquara. BR
  • Soares, Ana Prates; Universidade de São Paulo. Hospital of Rehabilitation of Oralfacial Anomalies. Area of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima; Universidade Estadual Paulista. Araraquara Dental School. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Clinic. Araraquara. BR
  • Martins, Lidia Parsekian; Universidade Estadual Paulista. Araraquara Dental School. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Clinic. Araraquara. BR
  • Gandini Junior, Luiz Gonzaga; Universidade Estadual Paulista. Araraquara Dental School. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Clinic. Araraquara. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 14(3): 251-255, July-Sept. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-770531
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Aim:

To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN(r), Morelli(r), and Conexao(r)).

Methods:

Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX).

Results:

There was no significant differences among SIN(r), Morelli(r), and Conexao(r) mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN(r)presented also N and O in their composition.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli(r), SIN(r) and Conexao(r) presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN(r)mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Orthodontics / Titanium / Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Estadual Paulista/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Orthodontics / Titanium / Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Estadual Paulista/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR