Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
Angelini, Fabio Jansen; Helito, Camilo Partezani; Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo; Guimarães, Tales Mollica; Pécora, José Ricardo; Demange, Marco Kawamura.
  • Angelini, Fabio Jansen; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Helito, Camilo Partezani; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Guimarães, Tales Mollica; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Pécora, José Ricardo; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Demange, Marco Kawamura; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
Acta ortop. bras ; 24(1): 22-26, Jan.-Feb. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-771862
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. Methods: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrained implant hinge associated to rotating tibial basis, with minimum follow-up of two years. The indications for the procedure included instability, septic loosening, late postoperative infection without loosening and periprosthetic fracture. We evaluated the knee range of movement and functional outcomes by the Knee Society Score (KSS) e Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), besides the presence of complications. Results: All patients achieved 5o to 85o minimum range of motion at 1 year postoperatively and, in the present evaluation, KSS ranged from 67 to 95. Three patients had no complications until the last evaluation and two patients required implant revision. Conclusion: Despite the complications rate observed, the functional result were acceptable for most patients, and it proved being a viable alternative, especially for patients with low functional demand. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: Acta ortop. bras Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: Acta ortop. bras Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR