Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative methods for somatosensory evaluation in atypical odontalgia
PORPORATTI, André Luís; COSTA, Yuri Martins; STUGINSKI-BARBOSA, Juliana; BONJARDIM, Leonardo Rigoldi; CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues; SVENSSON, Peter.
  • PORPORATTI, André Luís; Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • COSTA, Yuri Martins; Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • STUGINSKI-BARBOSA, Juliana; Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • BONJARDIM, Leonardo Rigoldi; Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues; Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • SVENSSON, Peter; Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Bauru. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-7, 2015. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777215
ABSTRACT
A systematic review was conducted to identify reliable somatosensory evaluation methods for atypical odontalgia (AO) patients. The computerized search included the main databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library). The studies included used the following quantitative sensory testing (QST)

methods:

mechanical detection threshold (MDT), mechanical pain threshold (MPT) (pinprick), pressure pain threshold (PPT), dynamic mechanical allodynia with a cotton swab (DMA1) or a brush (DMA2), warm detection threshold (WDT), cold detection threshold (CDT), heat pain threshold (HPT), cold pain detection (CPT), and/or wind-up ratio (WUR). The publications meeting the inclusion criteria revealed that only mechanical allodynia tests (DMA1, DMA2, and WUR) were significantly higher and pain threshold tests to heat stimulation (HPT) were significantly lower in the affected side, compared with the contralateral side, in AO patients; however, for MDT, MPT, PPT, CDT, and WDT, the results were not significant. These data support the presence of central sensitization features, such as allodynia and temporal summation. In contrast, considerable inconsistencies between studies were found when AO patients were compared with healthy subjects. In clinical settings, the most reliable evaluation method for AO in patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain would be intraindividual assessments using HPT or mechanical allodynia tests.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Toothache / Pain Measurement / Pain Threshold Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Toothache / Pain Measurement / Pain Threshold Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR