Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial
HESSE, Daniela; BONIFÁCIO, Clarissa Calil; GUGLIELMI, Camila de Almeida Brandão; FRANCA, Carolina da; MENDES, Fausto Medeiros; RAGGIO, Daniela Prócida.
  • HESSE, Daniela; Universidade de São Paulo. Dental School. Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department. São Paulo. BR
  • BONIFÁCIO, Clarissa Calil; Universidade de São Paulo. Dental School. Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department. São Paulo. BR
  • GUGLIELMI, Camila de Almeida Brandão; Universidade de São Paulo. Dental School. Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department. São Paulo. BR
  • FRANCA, Carolina da; Universidade de São Paulo. Dental School. Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department. São Paulo. BR
  • MENDES, Fausto Medeiros; Universidade de São Paulo. Dental School. Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department. São Paulo. BR
  • RAGGIO, Daniela Prócida; Universidade de São Paulo. Dental School. Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department. São Paulo. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-9, 2015. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777267
ABSTRACT
Clinical trials are normally performed with well-known brands of glass ionomer cement (GIC), but the cost of these materials is high for public healthcare in less-affluent communities. Given the need to research cheaper materials, it seems pertinent to investigate the retention rate of a low-cost GIC applied as atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants in two centers in Brazil. Four hundred and thirty-seven 6-to-8-year-old schoolchildren were selected in two cities in Brazil. The children were randomly divided into two groups, according to the tested GIC applied in the first permanent molars. The retention rate was evaluated after 3, 6 and 12 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed. The variables were tested for association with sealant longevity, using logistic regression analyses (α = 5%). The retention rate of sealants after 12 months was 19.1%. The high-cost GIC brand presented a 2-fold-more-likely-to-survive rate than the low-cost brand (p < 0.001). Significant difference was also found between the cities where the treatments were performed, in that Barueri presented a higher sealant survival rate than Recife (p < 0.001). The retention rate of a low-cost GIC sealant brand was markedly lower than that of a well-known GIC sealant brand.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Pit and Fissure Sealants / Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment / Glass Ionomer Cements Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Health economic evaluation Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Pit and Fissure Sealants / Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment / Glass Ionomer Cements Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Health economic evaluation Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2015 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR