Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
Barbosa Junior, Humberto do Nascimento; Siqueira Junior, Tiberio Moreno; Barreto, Françualdo; Menezes, Leonardo Gomes; Luna, Mauro José Catunda; Calado, Adriano Almeida.
  • Barbosa Junior, Humberto do Nascimento; Universidade de Pernambuco. Departamento de Urologia. Recife. BR
  • Siqueira Junior, Tiberio Moreno; Universidade de Pernambuco. Departamento de Urologia. Recife. BR
  • Barreto, Françualdo; Universidade de Pernambuco. Departamento de Urologia. Recife. BR
  • Menezes, Leonardo Gomes; Universidade de Pernambuco. Departamento de Urologia. Recife. BR
  • Luna, Mauro José Catunda; Universidade de Pernambuco. Departamento de Urologia. Recife. BR
  • Calado, Adriano Almeida; Universidade de Pernambuco. Departamento de Urologia. Recife. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(3): 438-448, tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-785715
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatectomy / Laparoscopy / Learning Curve Type of study: Observational study Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Pernambuco/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatectomy / Laparoscopy / Learning Curve Type of study: Observational study Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Pernambuco/BR