Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sunitinib treatment in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA) experience
Coelho, Rafael Corrêa; Reinert, Tomás; Campos, Franz; Peixoto, Fábio Affonso; Andrade, Carlos Augusto de; Castro, Thalita; Herchenhorn, Daniel.
Affiliation
  • Coelho, Rafael Corrêa; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
  • Reinert, Tomás; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
  • Campos, Franz; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
  • Peixoto, Fábio Affonso; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
  • Andrade, Carlos Augusto de; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
  • Castro, Thalita; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
  • Herchenhorn, Daniel; Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Departamento de Oncologia Clínica. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(4): 694-703, July-Aug. 2016. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-794674
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sunitinib treatment in a non-screened group of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) treated by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) at a single reference institution. Material and

Methods:

Retrospective cohort study, which evaluated patients with mRCC who received sunitinib between May 2010 and December 2013.

Results:

Fifty-eight patients were eligible. Most patients were male 41 (71%), with a median age of 58 years. Nephrectomy was performed in 41 (71%) patients with a median interval of 16 months between the surgery and initiation of sunitinib. The most prevalent histological subtype was clear cell carcinoma, present in 52 (91.2%) patients. In 50 patients (86%), sunitinib was the first line of systemic treatment. The main adverse effects were fatigue (57%), hypothyroidism (43%), mucositis (33%) and diarrhea (29%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were infrequent fatigue (12%), hypertension (12%), thrombocytopenia (7%), neutropenia (5%) and hand-foot syndrome (5%). Forty percent of patients achieved a partial response and 35% stable disease, with a disease control rate of 75%. Median progression free survival was 7.6 months and median overall survival was 14.1 months.

Conclusion:

Sunitinib treatment was active in the majority of patients, especially those with low and intermediate risk by MSKCC score, with manageable toxicity. Survival rates were inferior in this non-screened population with mRCC treated in the SUS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Pyrroles / Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Indoles / Kidney Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2016 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Pyrroles / Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Indoles / Kidney Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2016 Type: Article