Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Auditory Speech Perception Tests in Relation to the Coding Strategy in Cochlear Implant
Bazon, Aline Cristine; Mantello, Erika Barioni; Gonçales, Alina Sanches; Isaac, Myriam de Lima; Hyppolito, Miguel Angelo; Reis, Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa.
  • Bazon, Aline Cristine; Universidade de São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Mantello, Erika Barioni; Universidade de São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Gonçales, Alina Sanches; Universidade de São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Isaac, Myriam de Lima; Universidade de São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Hyppolito, Miguel Angelo; Universidade de São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Reis, Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa; Universidade de São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Ribeirão Preto. BR
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 20(3): 254-260, July-Sept. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-795208
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction The objective of the evaluation of auditory perception of cochlear implant users is to determine how the acoustic signal is processed, leading to the recognition and understanding of sound. Objective To investigate the differences in the process of auditory speech perception in individuals with postlingual hearing loss wearing a cochlear implant, using two different speech coding strategies, and to analyze speech perception and handicap perception in relation to the strategy used. Methods This study is prospective cross-sectional cohort study of a descriptive character. We selected ten cochlear implant users that were characterized by hearing threshold by the application of speech perception tests and of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults. Results There was no significant difference when comparing the variables subject age, age at acquisition of hearing loss, etiology, time of hearing deprivation, time of cochlear implant use and mean hearing threshold with the cochlear implant with the shift in speech coding strategy. There was no relationship between lack of handicap perception and improvement in speech perception in both speech coding strategies used. Conclusion There was no significant difference between the strategies evaluated and no relation was observed between them and the variables studied.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Auditory Perception / Hearing Loss / Hearing Tests Type of study: Observational study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Auditory Perception / Hearing Loss / Hearing Tests Type of study: Observational study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR