Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
Mussi, Thais Caldara; Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo; Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes de; Lemos, Gustavo Caserta; Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb.
  • Mussi, Thais Caldara; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. São Paulo. BR
  • Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. São Paulo. BR
  • Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes de; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. São Paulo. BR
  • Lemos, Gustavo Caserta; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. São Paulo. BR
  • Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. São Paulo. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(5): 897-905, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-796878
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (US) biopsy with imaging fusion using multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), with an emphasis on clinically significant tumors according to histological criteria. Materials and

Methods:

A total of 189 consecutive US/MRI fusion biopsies were performed obtaining systematic and guided samples of suspicious areas on mpMRI using a 3 Tesla magnet without endorectal coil. Clinical significance for prostate cancer was established based on Epstein criteria.

Results:

In our casuistic, the average Gleason score was 7 and the average PSA was 5.0ng/mL. Of the 189 patients that received US/MRI biopsies, 110 (58.2%) were positive for PCa. Of those cases, 88 (80%) were clinically significant, accounting for 46.6% of all patients. We divided the MRI findings into 5 Likert scales of probability of having clinically significant PCa. The positivity of US/MRI biopsy for clinically significant PCa was 0%, 17.6% 23.5%, 53.4% and 84.4% for Likert scores 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of biopsy results between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI and also when biopsy results were divided into groups of clinically non-significant versus clinically significant between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI (p-value <0.05 in both analyzes).

Conclusion:

We found that there is a significant difference in cancer detection using US/MRI fusion biopsy between low-probability and intermediate/high probability Likert scores using mpMRI.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Image-Guided Biopsy Type of study: Diagnostic study / Evaluation studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Image-Guided Biopsy Type of study: Diagnostic study / Evaluation studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein/BR