Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation injury to the spinal cord in head and neck cancers: does field arrangement have a role.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 2006 Apr-Jun; 2(2): 65-7
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-111493
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

A study of eight cases of head and neck cancers, to see if the cord was getting a higher dose in the antero-posterior (A-P) fields, compared to the bilateral (B/L) fields.

OBJECTIVE:

Radiation damage to the spinal cord is a critical issue for the radiation oncologists. This study was conducted to evaluate, if the dose to the spinal cord is higher by the antero-posterior (A-P) fields, compared to the bilateral (B/L) fields. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Eight cases of head and neck cancer were taken in our study. Two beam arrangements were placed in the treatment planning system, the B/L and the A-P fields. The DVH's for the cord dose were recorded and compared in both plans, with a standard fraction size of 200 cGy/fraction.

RESULTS:

The mean dose to the spinal cord was 168.06 cGy in A-P arrangement, while it was 133.75 cGy in the B/L arrangement.

CONCLUSION:

A-P field arrangement in head and neck malignancies delivers a higher dose to the spinal cord. Therefore, we need to spare the cord at an earlier dose limit.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Main subject: Radiation Injuries / Radiotherapy / Spinal Cord / Spinal Cord Diseases / Female / Humans / Male / Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation / Head and Neck Neoplasms Language: English Journal: J Cancer Res Ther Journal subject: Neoplasms / Therapeutics Year: 2006 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Main subject: Radiation Injuries / Radiotherapy / Spinal Cord / Spinal Cord Diseases / Female / Humans / Male / Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation / Head and Neck Neoplasms Language: English Journal: J Cancer Res Ther Journal subject: Neoplasms / Therapeutics Year: 2006 Type: Article