Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative Study Measuring Surface Pressure Among Variation of Adhesive Dressing Methods.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-132939
ABSTRACT
Abstract A Comparative Study Measuring Surface Pressure Among Variation of Adhesive Dressing Methods.   Suphakan      Techapongsatorn      MD.,* Anan               Manomaipiboon         MD., MSc (Clinical Epidemiology)* Cherdchai      Kittipovanon               MD.,* Satit                Srimontayamas         MD.,* Pong               Kanchanasuttirak      MD.*   *Department of Surgery, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital  

Objective:

To compare the surface pressure of various adhesive dressing after mastectomy. Study

design:

Experimental study in thoracic and breast model. Intervention Four types of adhesive dressing, including 1)         adhesive dressing with fixumull® 2)         adhesive dressing with OCL elastic bandage BPC 3)         adhesive dressing with tensoplast®  EAB 4)         adhesive dressing with compressive brassiere, were applies to the model. Surface pressure was measures at 0, 1, 6, 24 hours. The experiment was repeated for 6 times. Data were analysed by using ANCOVA and repeated measure analysis.

Results:

The surface pressure of adhesive dressing with fixumull®, OCL elastic bandage BPC®  , tensoplast®  EAB and compressive brassiere were not different. The surface pressure of adhesive dressing from compressive brassiere was the most sustainable during the first 24 hours.

Conclusion:

Each kinds of adhesive dressing produced different pressure. the adhesive dressing from compressive brassiere was the most sustainable of the surface pressure than others. Vajira Med J 2005 ; 49 117 - 122
Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Language: English Year: 2010 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Language: English Year: 2010 Type: Article