Perceptions about anxiety, depression and somatization in general medical settings: A qualitative study.

ABSTRACT

Background. The recognition rates of anxiety and depression in general medical settings, despite the significant prevalence of such presentations, are low. Psychiatrists argue that the recognition and management of these conditions by physicians is less than optimal in primary care and general practice. We did this study to gain insights into physicians’ perspectives on anxiety, depression and somatization, the conceptual models they employ and the practical problems they face in managing such patients in general medical settings. Methods. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with family and primary care physicians. The FGDs for physicians were tape recorded and transcribed, verbatim. The views of psychiatrists working in liaison clinics were also ascertained. Results. Family and primary physicians admitted to a high prevalence of patients who present with medically unexplained symptoms. They noted the co-occurrence of psychosocial stress. All physicians working in general medical settings admitted to difficulty in separating anxiety, depression and somatic presentations because of milder, less distinct syndromes and overlapping symptoms. They argued that it was difficult to use the current three-category division and that a more complex classification would be time-consuming and impractical in primary care. Conclusion. Psychiatric classifications for use in primary care should consider the different context and employ physicians’ perspectives rather than push specialist concepts and criteria.