Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2015 Sept; 63(9): 722-727
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-178890
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. Materials and

Methods:

The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source optical coherence tomography (SS‑OCT, Casia SS‑1000°CT, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), a rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning slit topographer (Orbscan IIz topography, Baush and Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA), and a hand‑held spectral domain OCT (HHSD‑OCT, Bioptigen Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA). Test‑retest variability, correlation between measurements and interdevice agreement were analyzed.

Results:

Fifty eyes of 25 participants were analyzed in this study. All measurement methods correlated well with each other (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Mean ± standard deviation CCT measured by HHSD‑OCT, Orbscan IIz, SS‑OCT, and Pentacam was 462 ± 41 μm, 458 ± 41 μm, 454 ± 40 μm, and 447 ± 42 μm, respectively. While the HHSD‑OCT over‑estimated the CCT (P < 0.001), there was a good correlation between the measurements obtained from the other three devices. However, the numerical difference was high and this trend was seen in all the paired comparisons.

Conclusions:

Though the measurements by different devices correlated well, the numerical agreement may be inadequate for their interchangeable use in clinical practice.

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Language: English Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Language: English Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Year: 2015 Type: Article