Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Burden and depression in primary caregivers of persons with visual impairment.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2016 Aug; 64(8): 572-577
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179411
ABSTRACT
Context Caregivers who assist persons with visual impairment often neglect their needs, resulting in burden and depression. Rehabilitation efforts, directed to the disabled, seldom target the caregiver.

Aim:

To assess burden and depression in persons caring for blind individuals. Settings and

Design:

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the outpatient department of a tertiary‑level teaching hospital in New Delhi. Materials and

Methods:

Institutional Ethical Board approval was obtained and written informed consent too was obtained from the participants involved in this study. Persons with best‑corrected vision <20/200 in the better eye, and their primary caregivers, were recruited. We recorded demography, other illness/disability, household income, relationship with disabled person, and caregiver burden (Caregiver Burden Scale) and depression (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Statistical

Analysis:

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 20 (Released 2011. Armonk, NY IBM Corp.); range, average, and standard deviation were determined for age, burden, and depression. The association between burden and depression was determined using Pearson’s correlation; the relationship between degree of disability and caregiver burden and depression was determined using unpaired t‑test; using multiple linear regression, factors were found to be statistically significant; significance was taken at P < 0.05.

Results:

Twenty‑seven (53.0%) men and 24 (47.0%) women had visual impairment. Most caregivers (n = 40; 81.6%) were first‑degree relatives or a spouse; 32 (65%) had schooling <5 years; and 29 (59%) were unemployed. Depression ranged from 21 to 52 (average 43.2 ± 5.71); it correlated with degree of disability (P = 0.012), household income (r = −0.320; P = 0.025), and burden (r = 0.616; P < 0.001). Burden ranged from 30 to 73 (average 54.5 ± 6.73) and correlated with degree of disability (P = 0.006). On multiple linear regression, burden predicted depression (r = 0.557; P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Caregivers merit community support, financial benefit, interventions to diagnose and treat depression, and training in coping. Centers that provide disability certification could offer counseling.

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Year: 2016 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Year: 2016 Type: Article