Comparison of Outcomes using Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) -3 and PIM-2 Models in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Indian Pediatr
;
2018 Nov; 55(11): 972-974
Article
| IMSEAR
| ID: sea-199211
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
To compare patient outcomes using the Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM-3)model with PIM-2 model for children admitted to the intensive care unit.Methods:
Weprospectively recorded the baseline characteristics, variables of PIM-3 and PIM-2 atadmission, and outcomes of children ?17 years over a period of 11 months. We used AreaUnder Receiver Operating Characteristics (AU-ROC) curves and Goodness-of-fit (GOF)tests to determine which of the two models had better discrimination and calibration.Results:
Out of 202 children enrolled, 69 (34%) died. Sepsis and pneumonia were thecommon admitting diagnoses. The AU-ROC was better for PIM-3 (0.75) as compared to PIM-2 (0.69; P=0.001). The GOF-P value was 0.001 for both models, that indicated poorcalibration of both (P<0.001). The AU-ROC curves were acceptable across different age anddiagnostic sub-groups.Conclusion:
PIM-3 had better discrimination when compared toPIM-2 in our unit. Both models had poor calibration across deciles of risk.
Full text:
Available
Index:
IMSEAR (South-East Asia)
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Journal:
Indian Pediatr
Year:
2018
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS