Photodynamic therapy for AMD and non-AMD patients: two-year results in Thais.
Article
in English
| IMSEAR
| ID: sea-39483
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the long-term effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and non-AMD in Thailand and to compare with the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) and Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) study. MATERIAL ANDMETHOD:
The data of patients who received PDT between July 2003 and December 2004 and had completed two-year follow-up were prospectively reviewed. Treated eyes were classified into two main groups, the AMD (group 1) and non-AMD (group 2) groups. The AMD group was further divided into three subgroups, group 1A, AMD with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and TAP/VIP compatible if they followed the recommendation guidelines characteristics, group 1B, AMD with subfoveal CNV and TAP/VIP incompatible, and group 1C, AMD with non-subfoveal CNV. The main outcomes were visual acuity change, number of treatments and the comparison with the first year results.RESULTS:
Of 56 eyes, 46 eyes (82.14%) had completed 24-month follow-up. Thirty-four eyes had CNV-related AMD and 12 eyes were non-AMD. At the 24-month follow-up, mean visual acuity change in group 1A, 1B, 1C were increased 0.25 (p = 0.13), 0.05 (p = 0.52), and 0.28 (p = 0.003), respectively. The total number of treatments in the first and second year was 1.8 and 0.1 in group 1A, 2.3 and 0.1 in group 1B, 1.5 and 0.25 in group 1C.CONCLUSION:
PDT was effective in Thai patients for the two-year follow-up even if they were not compatible with TAP/VIP criteria. The treatment demonstrated stabilization or less visual loss in long-term results.
Full text:
Available
Index:
IMSEAR (South-East Asia)
Type of study:
Practice guideline
Language:
English
Year:
2009
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS