Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of short-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.
Indian Heart J ; 2005 Jul-Aug; 57(4): 304-10
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-4775
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Risk stratification and prediction of high risk for mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes is based on clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram, biochemical markers and various risk assessment scores. There is emerging evidence that N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide possesses several characteristics of an ideal biomarker. In this study we looked into the role of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in risk stratification and prediction of short-term events including mortality in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

A total of 120 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, including both ST elevation myocardial infarction (n=80) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (n=40) were enrolled. Serum N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide was measured using electrochemiluminiscence assay (Roche Diagnostics), on the Elecsys 2010 system. On two-dimentional echocardiography, modified Simpson's technique was used to measure the ejection fraction along with end-systolic volume. Various other demographic variables, echocardiographic parameters and risk scores were also assessed. Follow-up at day 30 included a two-dimentional echocardiographic evaluation and assessment for worsening heart failure, recurrent ischemia, and repeat hospitalization. Death due to cardiovascular cause by 30 days was also noted. The mean value of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide for the whole cohort was 2307 +/- 2287 pg/ml (271.4 +/- 269.1 pmol/L). For the purpose of comparative analysis, the median value was determined [1403 pg/ml (165 pmol/L)]. In patients having N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide above median, the end-systolic volume was higher while ejection fraction was significantly lower at baseline (p<0.05). At 30 days follow-up, there was a further decline in ejection fraction from 47.7 +/- 11.4 to 43.9 +/- 9.9 (p<0.05), and clinical outcomes were worse in this group. There was a 5% mortality in the entire study group and all patients who died had N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide above median. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide above median (OR=32.79, 95% CI 8.74-123.1, p<0.001) emerged as the strongest predictors of adverse outcomes, including 30-day mortality (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide emerged as a strong prognostic tool across the spectrum of acute myocardial infarction and had the strongest predictive value for short-term adverse outcomes including death.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Main subject: Peptide Fragments / Prognosis / Protein Precursors / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Biomarkers / Logistic Models / Risk Assessment Type of study: Etiology study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Indian heart j Year: 2005 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: IMSEAR (South-East Asia) Main subject: Peptide Fragments / Prognosis / Protein Precursors / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Biomarkers / Logistic Models / Risk Assessment Type of study: Etiology study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Indian heart j Year: 2005 Type: Article