Prognostic analysis of critically ill patients with coagulation dysfunction by thrombelastogram and coagulation 4 items combined APACHEⅡ score / 中国输血杂志

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To explore the prognosis of critically ill patients with coagulation dysfunction using thrombelastogram(TEG) and coagulation four items combined with APACHEⅡ score. 【Methods】 From March 2017 to March 2020, 287 critically ill patients with coagulation dysfunction in our hospital were selected as the study group, and 303 patients with normal coagulation function during the same period were set as the control. The study group was divided into low-risk group(group A), intermediate-risk group(group B) and high-risk group (group C) based on the APACHEⅡ score, and into survival group and death group according to the prognosis. The difference of TEG, coagulation four items, and APACHEⅡ scores between the two groups were analyzed. The correlation and difference between TEG, coagulation four items and APACHE II score in the study group were analyzed. The ROC curve was drawn to analyze the prognostic predictive value of research indicators. 【Results】 Blood coagulation function related indicators in the study group fluctuated significantly in comparison to the control, the CI value, MA value, and α angle were smaller, while the K time and R time were longer; among the coagulation four items, PT, APTT and TT were higher; Fg level was lower, and the APACHE Ⅱ score was higher(P0.05). There were significant differences between the TEG and coagulation function related index levels in patients with different prognosis. Compared with the survivals, the CI value, MA value and α angle of the dead group were smaller, while the K time and R time were longer; and among the coagulation four items, PT, APTT, and TT were higher, the Fg level was lower, and the APACHEⅡ score was higher (PP4\\P5>APACHE Ⅱ score>P1>P2. 【Conclusion】 TEG, coagulation four items, and APACHE Ⅱ score can be used to assess the severity of patients with severe coagulation dysfunction. and the combined application of the 3 indicators are of high value in predicting the prognosis of such patients, and can provide reference for clinical formulation or adjustment of intervention programs to correct coagulation dysfunction.