Evaluation of Revised Atlanta Classification and Determinant-based Classification for Acute Pancreatitis / 胃肠病学

ABSTRACT

Background: The revised Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC) are widely used in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). However, studies on comparison between RAC and DBC are scarce. Aims: To explore the accuracy of RAC and DBC in the assessment of AP severity. Methods: The clinical data of 481 AP patients from September 2015 to September 2019 at Taizhou People's Hospital were collected and severity were stratified according to RAC and DBC. The treatment and prognosis of each subgroup were compared. Results: On the basis of RAC, 269 (55.9%), 174 (36.2%) and 38 (7.9%) patients were classified as mild AP (MAP), moderate severe AP (MSAP) and severe AP (SAP), respectively. There were significant differences in mortality, ICU monitoring rate, ICU stay, operation rate and hospital stay among the above groups (P<0.05). On the basis of DBC, 319 (66.3%), 117 (24.3%), 34 (7.1%) and 11 (2.3%) patients were classified as MAP, MSAP, SAP and critical AP (CAP), respectively. There were significant differences in mortality, ICU monitoring rate, ICU stay, operation rate and hospital stay among the above groups (P<0.05). The ICU monitoring rate (100% vs. 63.2%, P=0.014), median ICU stay (35 days vs. 15 days, P=0.001), hospital stay [(50.36±21.54) days vs. (22.78±14.56) days, P=0.038] were significantly increased in CAP patients (classified by DBC) than those in SAP patients (classified by RAC), however, no significant differences in mortality and operation rate were found between the two groups (P=0.136; P=0.202). Conclusions: Both RAC and DBC can accurately stratify the severity of AP. SAP patients (classified by RAC) complicated with infected necrosis should be further classified into CAP.