Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis
Korean Journal of Radiology ; : 1188-1196, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-102549
ABSTRACT
Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from the usual meta-analysis of therapeutic/interventional studies in that, it is required to simultaneously analyze a pair of two outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity, instead of a single outcome. Since sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated and could be affected by a threshold effect, more sophisticated statistical methods are required for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Hierarchical models including the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model are increasingly being accepted as standard methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. We provide a conceptual review of statistical methods currently used and recommended for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. This article could serve as a methodological reference for those who perform systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Research / Software / ROC Curve / Databases, Factual / Area Under Curve / Diagnostic Tests, Routine Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Korean Journal of Radiology Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Research / Software / ROC Curve / Databases, Factual / Area Under Curve / Diagnostic Tests, Routine Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Korean Journal of Radiology Year: 2015 Type: Article