Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Affecting Sentence-in-Noise Recognition for Normal Hearing Listeners and Listeners with Hearing Loss
Journal of Audiology & Otology ; : 81-87, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-121285
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Despite amplified speech, listeners with hearing loss often report more difficulties understanding speech in background noise compared to normal-hearing listeners. Various factors such as deteriorated hearing sensitivity, age, suprathreshold temporal resolution, and reduced capacity of working memory and attention can attribute to their sentence-in-noise problems. The present study aims to determine a primary explanatory factor for sentence-in-noise recognition difficulties in adults with or without hearing loss. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

Forty normal-hearing (NH) listeners (23-73 years) and thirty-four hearing-impaired (HI) listeners (24-80 years) participated for experimental testing. For both NH and HI group, the younger, middle-aged, older listeners were included. The sentence recognition score in noise was measured at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. The ability of temporal resolution was evaluated by gap detection performance using the Gaps-In-Noise test. Listeners' short-term auditory working memory span was measured by forward and backward digit spans.

RESULTS:

Overall, the HI listeners' sentence-in-noise recognition, temporal resolution abilities, and digit forward and backward spans were poorer compared to the NH listeners. Both NH and HI listeners had a substantial variability in performance. For NH listeners, only the digit backward span explained a small proportion of the variance in their sentence-in-noise performance. For the HI listeners, all the performance was influenced by age, and their sentence-in-noise difficulties were associated with various factors such as high-frequency hearing sensitivity, suprathreshold temporal resolution abilities, and working memory span. For the HI listeners, the critical predictors of the sentence-in-noise performance were composite measures of peripheral hearing sensitivity and suprathreshold temporal resolution abilities.

CONCLUSIONS:

The primary explanatory factors for the sentence-in-noise recognition performance differ between NH and HI listeners. Factors affecting sentence-in-noise recognition performance differed between NH and HI listeners. The working memory was the primary predictor of the sentence-in-noise scores for the NH individuals. In contrast, a combination of factors seemed to contributed to speech-in-noise understanding for the HI listeners. Given this, we must be careful not to generalize findings from the NH listeners to the HI individuals.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Signal-To-Noise Ratio / Hearing / Hearing Loss / Memory, Short-Term / Noise Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Journal of Audiology & Otology Year: 2017 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Signal-To-Noise Ratio / Hearing / Hearing Loss / Memory, Short-Term / Noise Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Journal of Audiology & Otology Year: 2017 Type: Article