Determining NOEL/NOAEL in Repeated-dose Toxicity Studies, When the Low Dose Group Shows Significant Difference in Quantitative Data / 한국실험동물학회지
Laboratory Animal Research
;
: 133-137, 2010.
Article
in English
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-129628
ABSTRACT
In repeated-dose 28-day oral toxicity study design, the low dose is fixed as the no observed effect level (NOEL). But, in practice the low dose usually shows significant difference in few measurable items in most of the studies. We investigated 109 of repeated-dose 28-day oral toxicity studies in rats conducted according to the Chemical Substance Control Law, Japan and examined the measurable items (functional observational battery, urinalysis, hematology, blood chemistry and absolute and relative organ weights) of the low dose group which showed a statistical significant difference (P<0.05) compared to the respective control groups. The investigation revealed that, 205/12,167 (1.6%) measurable items showed a significant difference in the low dose groups. The significant difference shown by urinalysis was high (3.3%), followed by clinical chemistry parameters, hematology, relative organ weights and absolute organ weights (1.8-1.1%). We conclude from the investigation that the low dose may be considered as NOEL, if the significant difference of measurable items of it is about 2% (maximum <5%), compared to the control. However, due consideration may be given to the clinical relevance of the items that showed a significant difference.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Organ Size
/
Chemistry, Clinical
/
Urinalysis
/
No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level
/
Hematology
/
Japan
/
Jurisprudence
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Limits:
Animals
Country/Region as subject:
Asia
Language:
English
Journal:
Laboratory Animal Research
Year:
2010
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS