Clinical Review of the Double Stapling Technique for Lower Rectal Cancer

ABSTRACT

From January 1993 to December 1995, 47 patients with rectal carcinomas underwent a rectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique at the Surgical Department of Kwang-ju Christian Hospital. The major advantages of the double stapling technique for lower rectal cancer over the single stapling technique or a hand-sewn operation are as follows1) Insertion of a purse-string suture is eliminated, and application of a linear stapler to close the distal rectum may be performed with greater ease. 2) In addition, fecal contamination and spillage of tumor cells from the rectal segment are minimized. 3) Differences in the sizes of the colons and rectums are not a concern in constructing the anastomosis. 4) The operating time is shorter. The following results were obtained by a comparison with 24 patients with rectal carcinoma who had undergone a rectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique from January 1989 to December 1992 which was reported in a previous study1) Anastomotic stenosis was decreased from 8.3% to 4.2% because of reduced ischemia due to the double row of staples and the reduced injury due to compression of tissue between the anvil and the cartridge with experience. In addition, it resulted from reduced tension of the anastomosis due to sufficients mobilization of the proximal colon and from selection of large cartridge (33 mm). 2) Anastomotic leakage, even though the same location as the tumor and in the advanced age group, was decreased from 4.2% to 0% because the blood circulation was maintained and unnecessary tension was reduced with experience. In addition, it resulted from reinforced suture of the anastomotic site which was performed after anastomosis. 3) Systemic recurrence was the same result as that of the previous study(4.2/4.3%). 4) Local recurrence, even though at the same distal distance from the margin of the cancer, was increased from 0% to 2.1% because of advancing the pathologic stage (B2, C1>B1, B2) and increasing the poorly differentiated pathologic type.