Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between L and E gene amplification analytical methods for human papillomavirus typing / 부인종양
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ; : 251-255, 2008.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-140247
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

L and E6/E7 gene amplification analyses were compared to identify human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and verify the HPV type, with the intent to minimize HPV typing errors.

METHODS:

L1 gene verified HPV typing was accomplished via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and membrane assays. Verification of HPV typing via E6/E7 genes was accomplished through nested multiplexed PCR. The results from 104 samples were compared.

RESULTS:

The rates of accordance and difference were 35% and 65%, respectively. For 29% of the analyses, nested multiplexed PCR was more diversified than the membrane assay.

CONCLUSION:

HPV can be classified into low-risk HPV and high-risk HPV groups. In parallel amplifications of the L and E genes is more efficient for accurate diagnosis in light of the different symptoms and attendant precautions of the risk groups.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Gene Amplification / Polymerase Chain Reaction / Light / Membranes Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Year: 2008 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Gene Amplification / Polymerase Chain Reaction / Light / Membranes Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Year: 2008 Type: Article