Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
On comparison of SAS codes with GLM and MIXED for the crossover studies with QT interval data
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology ; : 78-82, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-159742
ABSTRACT
The structural complexity of crossover studies for bioequivalence test confuses analysts and leaves them a hard choice among various programs. Our study reviews PROC GLM and PROC MIXED in SAS and compares widely used SAS codes for crossover studies. PROC MIXED based on REML is more recommended since it provides best linear unbiased estimator of the random between-subject effects and its variance. Our study also considers the covariance structure within subject over period which most PK/PD studies and crossover studies ignore. The QT interval data after the administration of moxifloxacin for a fixed time point are analyzed for the comparison of representative SAS codes for crossover studies.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Therapeutic Equivalency / Cross-Over Studies Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: English Journal: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Year: 2014 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Therapeutic Equivalency / Cross-Over Studies Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: English Journal: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Year: 2014 Type: Article