Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Direct Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
;
: 469-474, 2014.
Article
in English
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-176259
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The use of direct lumbar interbody fusion (DLIF) has gradually increased; however, no studies have directly compared DLIF and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). We compared DLIF and TLIF on the basis of clinical and radiological outcomes.METHODS:
A retrospective review was performed on the medical records and radiographs of 98 and 81 patients who underwent TLIF and DLIF between January 2011 and December 2012. Clinical outcomes were compared with a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The preoperative and postoperative disc heights, segmental sagittal/coronal angles, and lumbar lordosis were measured on radiographs. Fusion rates, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, and complications were assessed.RESULTS:
DLIF was superior to TLIF regarding its ability to restore disc height, foraminal height, and coronal balance (p0.05).CONCLUSION:
Both DLIF and TLIF are less invasive and thus good surgical options for treating degenerative lumber diseases. DLIF has higher potential in increasing neural foramina and correcting coronal balance, and involves a shorter operative time and reduced EBL, in comparison with TLIF. However, DLIF displayed a lower fusion rate than TLIF, and caused complications related to the transpsoas approach.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Medical Records
/
Retrospective Studies
/
Operative Time
/
Visual Analog Scale
/
Length of Stay
/
Lordosis
Type of study:
Observational study
Limits:
Animals
/
Humans
Language:
English
Journal:
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Year:
2014
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS