Examination to Anesthetic Informed Consent / 대한마취과학회지
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
;
: 179-186, 2007.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-218010
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
As the problems of medical malpractices become a very serious social issue, it is necessary to increasingly relate law to medical practice and evaluate medical services. However, it is not easy to legally call someone to account, as medical services are highly specific, especially anesthetic management. Anesthesiologist can expect to be involved in legal action alleging malpractice, either as a defendant or expert witness.METHODS:
The anesthetic informed consent form was examined at 42 general hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The chief physician of the department of anesthesiology and pain medicine was asked for the anesthetic informed consent form they used in clinical anesthetic practice, and then what constitutes adequate informed consent analyzed.RESULTS:
All of the hospitals were using informed consent forms, but 42.9% of the hospital used a specific form to describe the complications or risks associated with anesthetic management. In 71.4% of hospitals, the anesthesiologists or anesthetic residents explained the anesthetic risk, but 28.6% of hospitals the anesthetic complications were explained by nurses or surgeons. In 76.2% of hospitals, the anesthetic risks were explained to both the patients and parents, but in 23.8% these were explained to parents only.CONCLUSIONS:
We propose a new anesthetic informed consent form for adequate explanation and agreement to legal requirements.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Parents
/
Consent Forms
/
Expert Testimony
/
Republic of Korea
/
Hospitals, General
/
Informed Consent
/
Jurisprudence
/
Anesthesiology
/
Malpractice
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
Asia
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Year:
2007
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS