Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic Field Interactions of Copper-Containing Intrauterine Devices in 3.0-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging: In Vivo Study
Korean Journal of Radiology ; : 416-422, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-218259
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

An ex vivo study found a copper-containing intrauterine device (IUD) to be safe for women undergoing an MRI examination at a 3.0-T field. No significant artifacts caused by the metallic implant were detected. However, there are still no in vivo data about these concerns. The aim of this study was to evaluate 3.0-T magnetic field interactions of copper-containing IUDs in vivo. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Magnetic field interactions and potential adverse events were evaluated in 33 women using a questionnaire-based telephone survey. Two experienced radiologists performed artifact evaluation on MR images of the pelvis.

RESULTS:

Eighteen patients were eligible for the survey. One patient reported a dislocation of the IUD after the MR examination. All other patients had no signs of field interactions. No IUD-related artifacts were found.

CONCLUSION:

MRI at 3.0-T is possible for women with copper-containing IUDs. However, consulting a gynecologist to check the correct position of the IUD and exclude complications after an MR examination is highly recommended. High-quality clinical imaging of the female pelvis can be performed without a loss in image quality.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Pelvis / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Artifacts / Copper / Magnetic Fields / Hot Temperature / Intrauterine Devices, Copper Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Korean Journal of Radiology Year: 2013 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Pelvis / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Artifacts / Copper / Magnetic Fields / Hot Temperature / Intrauterine Devices, Copper Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Korean Journal of Radiology Year: 2013 Type: Article