Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the prognosis of intertrochanteric fracture with different surgical methods in elderly: a retrospective survival analysis / 中国骨伤
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ; (12): 699-703, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-240960
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To determine the difference of post-operative mortality between ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) and hip replacement for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly by using survival analysis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 110 patients above 60 years old who underwent surgical treatment (ORIF or hip replacement) for the intertrochanteric fracture between April 2003 and May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the patients, 83 cases were treated with ORIF (ORIF group), there were 32 males and 51 females, aged from 61.44 to 98.75 years old with an average of (78.52 ± 7.98) years old; and 27 cases were treated with hip replacement (arthroplasty group), there were 8 males and 19 females, aged from 71.82 to 96.54 years old with an average of (79.99 ± 6.11) years old. A survival analysis was performed on the clinical data by using SPSS 110 software. The survival rate of 1-year,2-year, 5-year and the mean survival time for the total patients, the mortality rate of 1-year, 2-year in each group, the survival rate of 1-year, 2-year and mean survival time and survival curve in each group were included.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All wounds achieved primary healing and no deaths were found in stay hospital. All patients were followed up from 1 to 125 months with an average of (46.93 ± 29.53) months. Among all 110 cases, 31 were dead and 79 survived. The survival rate of 1-year, 2-year and 5-year was (90.7 ± 2.8)%, (82.5 ± 3.9)% and (57.6 ± 6.5)%, respectively,while the ensemble mean survival time was (84.137 ± 5.902) months. The mortality rate of 1-year, 2-year in ORIF group was 7.2% and 12.0%, respectively; and in arthroplasty group, there was 14.8% and 25.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in mortality rate of 1-year and 2-year between two groups. According to the survival analysis of the ORIF group, the survival rate of 1-year, 2-year was (92.6 ± 2.9)%, and (85.8 ± 4.3)%, respectively, and the mean survival time was (87.508 ± 6.063) months. In arthroplasty group, the survival rate of 1-year, 2-year was (85.2 ± 6.8)% and (73.9 ± 8.5)%,and the mean survival time was (67.294 ± 11.180) months. There was significant difference in mean survival time between two groups (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>ORIF can achieve a better postoperative survival compare with hip replacement in treating intertrochanteric fracture in elderly.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Prognosis / General Surgery / Retrospective Studies / Mortality / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Fracture Fixation, Internal / Hip Fractures Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: Chinese Journal: China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Prognosis / General Surgery / Retrospective Studies / Mortality / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Fracture Fixation, Internal / Hip Fractures Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: Chinese Journal: China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Year: 2015 Type: Article