Value of self-expanding metallic stent for obstructing left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer / 中华外科杂志

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the therapeutic value of self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) for resectable obstructing left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 73 patients who had acute obstruction due to left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer during May 2007 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups SEMS group (34 cases) underwent surgical resection after insertion of SEMS; emergency surgery group (39 cases) underwent emergency operation. The 2 group patients were compared for the incidence of primary anastomosis, stoma rate, laparoscopic surgery rate, mortality, postoperative morbidity, ICU admission rate, length of ICU stay, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The incidence of primary anastomosis in SEMS group was significantly higher than that in emergency surgery group (97.1% vs. 56.4%, χ(2) = 16.256, P < 0.001), and the protective stoma rate and permanent stoma rate in SEMS group were both lower than those in emergency surgery group (33.3% vs. 86.3%, 2.9% vs. 43.6%, χ(2) value were 14.972 and 16.156, both P < 0.001). Patients in SEMS group underwent significantly more laparoscopic surgery than in emergency surgery group (47.1% vs. 0, χ(2) = 23.505, P < 0.001). There were no significant difference in postoperative mortality (2.9% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.364). The postoperative morbidity in SEMS group was significantly lower than that in emergency surgery group (35.3% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.007). Incisional infection was the most common complication in both groups, and the incidence of which seemed to be more higher in emergency surgery group (17.6% vs. 38.5%, χ(2) = 3.840, P = 0.050). There was a lower ICU admission rate in SEMS group (24.2% vs. 53.9%, χ(2) = 6.972, P = 0.008), and the mean length of ICU stay and hospital stay were both shorter in SEMS group ((69.5 ± 7.4) hours vs. (114.3 ± 10.9) hours, t = -20.23, P < 0.001; (19.6 ± 4.8) days vs. (23.4 ± 6.2) days, t = -2.90, P = 0.005). The cost of hospitalization was less in SEMS group (45 383 ± 15 648 vs. 61 485 ± 20 380, t = -3.74, P < 0.001).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>SEMS can effectively relieve the large intestinal obstruction caused by left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer, and change the traditional emergency surgery into a selective surgery with better outcomes. SEMS appears to be a valuable technique for resectable obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer.</p>