Accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by trained non-physician graders using non-mydriatic fundus camera
Singapore medical journal
;
: 715-719, 2012.
Article
in English
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-249624
ABSTRACT
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>We compared the agreement of diabetic retinopathy (DR) assessment between trained non-physician graders (NPGs) and family physicians (FPs) in a primary healthcare setting.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This was a cross-sectional study conducted retrospectively over a period of one month. The participants were diabetic patients from two primary healthcare clinics (polyclinics) in Singapore. Single-field digital retinal images were obtained using a non-mydriatic 45-degree fundus camera. Retinal images were graded for the presence or absence of DR by FPs at the polyclinics and by NPGs at a central ocular grading centre. The FPs' and NPGs' assessments of DR were compared with readings by a single retinal specialist (reference standard).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 367 diabetic patients (706 eyes) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 63 years, and the majority were Chinese (83.8%). For DR assessment, the agreement between NPGs and the retinal specialist was substantial (ĸ = 0.66), while the agreement between FPs and the retinal specialist was only fair (ĸ = 0.40). NPGs' assessment showed higher sensitivity (70% vs. 45%) and comparable specificity (94% vs. 92%) as compared to FPs' assessment. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of NPGs' assessment of DR was greater than that of the FPs' (0.82 vs. 0.69, p < 0.001).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>This study has demonstrated that trained NPGs are able to provide good detection of DR and maculopathy from fundus photographs. Our findings suggest that DR screening by trained NPGs may provide a costeffective alternative to FPs.</p>
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Ophthalmology
/
Physicians, Family
/
Primary Health Care
/
Referral and Consultation
/
Singapore
/
Observer Variation
/
Cross-Sectional Studies
/
Reproducibility of Results
/
ROC Curve
/
Sensitivity and Specificity
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Observational study
/
Prevalence study
/
Prognostic study
/
Risk factors
/
Screening study
Limits:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Country/Region as subject:
Asia
Language:
English
Journal:
Singapore medical journal
Year:
2012
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS