Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy comparison between Ph⁺ ALL patients treated with chemotherapyplus tyrosine kinase inhibitors followed by allo-HSCT and Ph-ALL patients with allo-HSCT: a case control study from a single center / 中华血液学杂志
Chinese Journal of Hematology ; (12): 593-597, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-281975
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy of the Phacute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)patients treated with combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)and chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and Ph⁻ ALL patients with allo-HSCT.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 19 Ph⁺ALL patients were matched with 19 Ph⁻ALL patients from 55 B-ALL patients receiving allo-HSCT in our hospital between January 2003 and August 2014 and were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Gender, median age, number of patients with blood white count more than 30 × 10⁹/L, number of patients with meningeal leukemia, disease status before allo-HSCT, period of allo-HSCT, the source of stem cell from donors, HLA disparities between donor and recipient, conditioning regimens and number of infused mononuclear cells and CD34⁺ cells were comparable between two groups of Ph⁺ and 19 Ph⁻ALL patients. The median time of engraftment of neutrophil cells was 12 days versus 13 days (P= 0.284) and that of platelet 14 days versus 17 days (P=0.246), which were comparable between two groups. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) in Ph⁺ and Ph⁻ALL groups was (67.5 ± 12.4)% versus (74.3 ± 11.4)% (P=0.434) and 3-year disease free survival (DFS)was (67.8 ± 12.4)% versus (74.3 ± 11.4)% (P= 0.456), respectively. The cumulative incidence of degree Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD)in Ph⁺ and Ph⁻ ALL group was (15.8±8.4)% versus (21.1 ± 9.4)% (P=0.665)and that of degree Ⅲ-Ⅳ aGVHD was (5.6 ± 5.4)% versus (11.5 ± 7.6)% (P=0.541), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was (44.1 ± 14.0)% in Ph⁺ALL group versus (44.1 ± 13.0)% in Ph⁻ALL group (P=0.835) and that of extensive cGVHD was (13.1 ± 8.7)% versus (6.2 ± 6.1)% (P=0.379), respectively. The cumulative relapse rate and the cumulative non-relapse rate in both group also have no statistical difference [(10.8 ± 7.2)% versus (20.0 ± 10.7)% (P=0.957) and (23.9 ± 12.4)% versus (7.1±6.9)% (P=0.224), respectively].</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The efficacy of Ph⁺ALL treated with combination of chemotherapy and TKIs and followed by allo-HSCT is comparable to that of Ph⁻ALL with allo-HSCT.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Therapeutics / Protein-Tyrosine Kinases / Retrospective Studies / Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Disease-Free Survival / Drug Therapy / Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma / Graft vs Host Disease Type of study: Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Hematology Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Therapeutics / Protein-Tyrosine Kinases / Retrospective Studies / Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Disease-Free Survival / Drug Therapy / Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma / Graft vs Host Disease Type of study: Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Hematology Year: 2015 Type: Article