Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive Spinal Stabilization Using Fluoroscopic-Guided Percutaneous Screws as a Form of Palliative Surgery in Patients with Spinal Metastasis
Asian Spine Journal ; : 99-110, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-28507
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE:

To report the outcome of 50 patients with spinal metastases treated with minimally invasive stabilization (MISt) using fluoroscopic guided percutaneous pedicle screws with/without minimally invasive decompression. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE The advent of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw stabilization system has revolutionized the treatment of spinal metastasis.

METHODS:

Between 2008 and 2013, 50 cases of spinal metastasis with pathological fracture(s) with/without neurology deficit were treated by MISt at our institution. The patients were assessed by Tomita score, pain score, operation time, blood loss, neurological recovery, time to ambulation and survival.

RESULTS:

The mean Tomita score was 6.3+/-2.4. Thirty seven patients (74.0%) required minimally invasive decompression in addition to MISt. The mean operating time was 2.3+/-0.5 hours for MISt alone and 3.4+/-1.2 hours for MISt with decompression. Mean blood loss for MISt alone and MISt with decompression was 0.4+/-0.2 L and 1.7+/-0.9 L, respectively. MISt provided a statistically significant reduction in visual analog scale pain score with mean preoperative score of 7.9+/-1.4 that was significantly decreased to 2.5+/-1.2 postoperatively (p=0.000). For patients with neurological deficit, 70% displayed improvement of one Frankel grade and 5% had an improvement of 2 Frankel grades. No patient was bed-ridden postoperatively, with the average time to ambulation of 3.4+/-1.8 days. The mean overall survival time was 11.3 months (range, 2-51 months). Those with a Tomita score or =8 with a mean survival of 14.1+/-12.5 months and 6.8+/-4.9 months, respectively (p=0.019). There were no surgical complications, except one case of implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS:

MISt is an acceptable treatment option for spinal metastatic patients, providing good relief of instability back pain with no major complications.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Palliative Care / Prospective Studies / Cohort Studies / Walking / Back Pain / Decompression / Visual Analog Scale / Fractures, Spontaneous / Neoplasm Metastasis / Neurology Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Asian Spine Journal Year: 2016 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Palliative Care / Prospective Studies / Cohort Studies / Walking / Back Pain / Decompression / Visual Analog Scale / Fractures, Spontaneous / Neoplasm Metastasis / Neurology Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Asian Spine Journal Year: 2016 Type: Article