Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer / 中华男科学杂志
National Journal of Andrology
;
(12): 1106-1109, 2015.
Article
in Chinese
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-304766
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in the treatment of prostate cancer and investigate the clinical application value of RLRP.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively analyzed 70 cases of prostate cancer treated by RALRP and another 32 cases treated by LRP. We compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, catheter-indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, incisal margin positive rate, biochemical recurrence, and normal postoperative urinary continence and penile erectile function between the two groups of patients.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the operations were successfully accomplished. RALRP exhibited a significant superiority over LRP in intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, catheter-indwelling time, and postoperative hospital stay, urinary continence and erectile function (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, with its advantages of few postoperative complications and well-preserved urinary continence and penile erectile function, is an effective, safe and minimally invasive surgical option for prostate cancer.</p>
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Postoperative Complications
/
Postoperative Period
/
Prostatectomy
/
Prostatic Neoplasms
/
General Surgery
/
Penile Erection
/
Retrospective Studies
/
Blood Loss, Surgical
/
Laparoscopy
/
Operative Time
Type of study:
Observational study
Limits:
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Chinese
Journal:
National Journal of Andrology
Year:
2015
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS