Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of bowel plication combined with early enteral nutrition in the enhanced recovery after surgery for neonates with jejunal atresia / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 535-539, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-317592
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the efficacy of bowel plication combined with early enteral nutrition (EEN) in the enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) of jejunal atresia (JA) neonates.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Between January 2005 and January 2014, 58 neonates with JA underwent surgical treatment in Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Their clinical data, including operation procedures, ages, birth weight, concomitant diseases, age at surgery, hospital stay, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), postoperative intestinal function recovery (the time to the first oral feeding and the time to oral feeding volume reaching 150 ml·kg·d), complications and reoperation, were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>According to the surgical procedures, the 58 neonates were divided into three groups control group(18 cases, undergoing atretic segments resection and primary anastomosis), bowel plication group(19 cases, undergoing bowel plication after atretic segments resection and primary anastomosis) and bowel plication combined with EEN group (21 cases, undergoing bowel plication combined with EEN). No significant differences of ages, birth weight, age at operation, and concomitant diseases were found among 3 groups (all P>0.05). The time of hospital stay, the time to the first oral feeding, the time to oral feeding volume reaching 150 ml·kg·d, and the time of TPN in bowel plication group were significantly shorter than those of control group [(19.3±4.4) d vs. (22.7±3.1) d, t=2.696, P=0.011; (9.8±3.3) d vs. (12.5±3.0) d, t=2.630, P=0.013; (18.5±4.1) d vs. (21.5±2.5) d, t=2.726, P=0.011; (13.1±2.9) d vs. (15.0±2.3) d, t=2.219, P=0.033]. However, above parameters of bowel plication combined with EEN group were significantly shorter than those of bowel plication group [(15.3±3.5) d vs. (19.3±4.4), t=4.120, P=0.003; (7.7±2.2) d vs. (9.8±3.3) d, t=2.428, P=0.020; (14.8±2.5) d vs. (18.5±4.1) d, t=3.752, P=0.001; (9.5±3.0) vs. (13.1±2.9) d, t=4.370, P=0.000].</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The bowel plication combined with EEN contributes to the early use of intestinal function, shorten the time to the first oral feeding, and reduces the use of TPN, which can improve the recovery of jejunal atresia neonates.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Postoperative Period / Rehabilitation / General Surgery / Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Congenital Abnormalities / Anastomosis, Surgical / Retrospective Studies / Enteral Nutrition / Parenteral Nutrition, Total / Defecation Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans / Infant, Newborn Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Year: 2017 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Postoperative Period / Rehabilitation / General Surgery / Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Congenital Abnormalities / Anastomosis, Surgical / Retrospective Studies / Enteral Nutrition / Parenteral Nutrition, Total / Defecation Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans / Infant, Newborn Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Year: 2017 Type: Article