Comparison of the incidence rates of anastomotic leak following lower anterior resection of rectal cancer between laparoscopic and open operation / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
; (12): 57-59, 2007.
Article
in Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-336500
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate and compare the incidence rates of postoperative anastomotic leak following laparoscopic (LP) versus open (OP) lower anterior resection for rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty-three cases of LP and 135 cases of OP lower anterior resection with rectal cancer site 5-8 cm away from anal edge were operated by the same surgeon team from Sep. 2000 to Dec. 2005. The differences of postoperative anastomotic leak of protective stomy and non-protective stomy between LP and OP groups were analysed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In LP group, the incidence rates of the postoperative anastomotic leak of protective stomy and non-protective stomy were 4.6% (1/22) and 6.5% (2/31) respectively (P>0.05, chi(2)=0.088). In OP group, the incidence rates were 2.3% (1/43) and 8.7% (8/92) respectively (P>0.05, chi(2)=1.024). No significant difference existed between LP and OP groups with protective stomy (P=0.455), neither did LP and OP groups without protective stomy (P=0.288).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer is a safe procedure. It doesn't increase the incidence rate of anastomotic leak as compared to traditional open surgery.</p>
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Main subject:
Anal Canal
/
Pathology
/
Postoperative Complications
/
Rectal Neoplasms
/
General Surgery
/
Anastomosis, Surgical
/
Incidence
/
Laparoscopy
/
Surgical Stomas
/
Fistula
Type of study:
Incidence_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Limits:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Zh
Journal:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Year:
2007
Type:
Article