Clinical study of preserving left colic artery during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer / 中华胃肠外科杂志

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the feasibility, safety, radicality and short-term outcome of preserving left colic artery (LCA) during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for the treatment of rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2013 to December 2016,136 patients with mid-lower rectal cancer received laparoscopic TME in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Taizhou People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province. Patients with rectal tumor within 10 cm to the anal verge were enrolled into the study. All the enrolled patients had complete data of pathology and follow-up. Those receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with severe base diseases, multifocal tumor, tumor invasion of surrounding tissues, fixation of tumor, recurrent tumor, complications such as acute ileus, bleeding, perforation were excluded. In this study, 72 patients did not undergo preservation of LCA (high ligation group) and 64 patients underwent preservation of LCA (low ligation group). Operative parameters, clinicopathological data and short-term outcome were collected and compared between two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The baseline data including gender, age, body mass index, tumor stage, and distance of tumor from anal verge of two groups were comparable (P>0.05). The differences between two groups about the mean time of operation and the operative blood loss were not significant [(164.0±12.6) min vs. (167.3±9.4) min, (30.0±3.6) ml vs. (30.1±3.0) ml, all P>0.05]. There was no operative death in both groups. Differences in the lymph node dissection (13.7±2.6 vs. 13.3±2.1) and the specimen length of proximal resection margin [(16.4±1.9) cm vs. (16.7±2.1) cm] or distal resection margins [(3.9±0.6) cm vs. (4.1±0.9) cm] between high and low ligation groups were not significant (all P>0.05). Compared with high ligation group, the low ligation group had higher rate of sphincter preservation [92.2% (59/64) vs. 79.2% (57/72), χ=4.580, P=0.032], lower rate of anastomotic leakage [1.6% (1/64) vs. 9.7% (7/72), χ=4.075, P=0.044], anastomotic stenosis [3.1% (2/64) vs. 12.5%(9/72), χ=4.006, P=0.045], and voiding and sexual dysfunction [6.3%(4/64) vs. 18.1%(13/72), χ=4.317, P=0.038]. Mean time of follow-up was 19 months. In high ligation group, the local recurrent rate was 5.56%, distant metastasis rate was 13.89%, overall survival rate was 90.28%, disease-free survival rate was 80.56%, while in low ligation group, the local recurrence rate was 4.69%, distant metastasis rate was 12.50%, overall survival rate was 90.63%, disease-free survival rate was 82.81%, whose differences between two groups were not significant (all P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Preservation of LCA during laparoscopic TME for the treatment of rectal cancer is safe and feasible, which can reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stenosis, and voiding and sexual dysfunction.</p>